In spite of their reputation as great literature, the Hebrew scriptures sometimes make joltingly uneven reading. Why is this? Other ancient texts, such as Gilgamesh, which would be expected to suffer from equal distortions due to translation from a long vanished cultural framework, show much better consistency of narrative. The flood/ark story, which was promulgated as part of the Epic of Gilgamesh long before being incorporated into Genesis, is a good example (details below).
Friedman's great achievement in "Who wrote the bible?" is to give an understandable and readable account of the editorial history of the Hebrew scripture. He traces the differing sources from which it was composed, and shows how their often incompatible writings were later combined into a single text. He starts with the story of the Flood, and shows how it can be separated into two different narrative voices, producing two stylistically and factually consistent stories.
Friedman goes on to give a fascinating account of the composition of the the first half of the Hebrew scripture, from Genesis to Ezra. He describes the groups that contributed, and how their particular aspirations and resentments are reflected in their contributions to the bible.
His account makes sense of the abrupt changes of style that often occur in the bible, and of some of the weird details and blatant factual contradictions. For example, the question of the number of clean animals on the ark is related to the importance of priests and sacrifice. The flood story is a composite from two sources, "J" and "P". J wrote the first version, in which there were seven of every clean animal and only two of the others, so that Noah could make a grateful sacrifice to God when he landed. P's version, coming later, was written by an Aaronid priest, who wanted to emphasize that sacrifice had only begun when God made Aaron high priest (and hence could only be legitimately performed by his descendents). In P's account, therefore, Noah did not perform a sacrifice, and only two of each animal were required.
The only problem I had in reading the book was that it was sometimes hard to keep track of the global picture of who wrote what and when. What it really needs is a roadmap: |
In Gilgamesh, Utnapishtim loads his boat with animals and
posessions.
Gilgamesh XI, col ii, ll 80-85:
In Genesis, the narrative is disjointed and repeatedly contradicts itself on the number of animals brought aboard:
Genesis shows equal confusion over the length of the flood.
Gilgamesh XI, col iii, ll 127-135:
Genesis:
Copyright © Mark Alford (1997)
alford(at)physics.wustl.edu